You might want to check out:
http://iwbrevolution.ning.com/
http://smartboardrevolution.ning.com/
https://quakertown.wikispaces.com/SMART%20Technology
Also, Robert Marzano conducted a study for Promethean that can be downloaded
here:
http://www.prometheanworld.com/server.php?show=nav.18837
However, some were quick to criticize the report:
http://edinsanity.com/2009/06/02/marzano_part1/
Hope this helps,
Lucy Gray
Education Technology Specialist
Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education
University of Chicago
http://cemse.uchicago.edu
773-834-5214 (Office)
682-233-5829 (Google Voice)
Sent from Elmwood Park, IL, United States
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Norman Maynard <nlm1@verizon.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It's been a while since I really looked into SB technology, and am
> wondering
> if anyone can summarize the options of what has *actually worked in the
> classroom.*
>
> I am looking at a very small space and so am wanting something
> self-contained" without the need for a projector, but I am unclear as to
> what tnat might mean in terms of functional limitations.
>
> Any advice gratefully appreciated!
>
> Norman Maynard
>
> [ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
> Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution,
> non-commercial, share-alike license.
> RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
>
[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
