Friday, October 16, 2009

Re: FW: Girls avoid "techie stuff"?

Don't forget the flip side of that coin. Too often girls who may be =
interested have a tendency to "dumb down" when a "cute boy" is in the room =
- mortified I watched my own daughter do this several times. They don't =
want to appear to be smarter than the boy they may like. Also, there is =
the whole "geek" connotation. A girl who is not secure with herself - and =
let's face it, how many teenage girls really are - don't want their =
friends to think they are geeks. Secretly it's okay to be smart, but in =
public the fear of being ostracized for being smart is still very real.
=20
Robin

>>> "Rodrigues, John" <rodrigues@nais.org> 10/16/2009 9:00 AM >>>
Thanks, indeed, for sharing the article, Marty. I wonder, however, if =
most of this behavior shouldn't be attributed to the patriarchal/male-domin=
ated environment that our children grow up in? That same Newsweek article =
also notes:


Blame (a) culture (b) family (c) schools (d) all of the above. Little boys =
are expected to roll around in the dirt and explore. Perfect training for =
learning to use computers, which often requires hours in front of the =
screen trying to figure out the messy arcanum of a particular program. =
Girls get subtle messages-from society if not from their parents-that they =
should keep their hands clean and play with their dolls. Too often, =
they're discouraged from taking science and math-not just by their schools =
but by parents as well (how many mothers have patted their daughters on =
the head and reassured them: "Oh, I wasn't good at math, either").

-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for independent school educators [mailto:ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.=
EDU] On Behalf Of Marty Billingsley
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 8:21 AM
To: ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU=20
Subject: Re: Girls avoid "techie stuff"?

There was a Newsweek article on this topic in the mid-90s that stuck

in my mind, so I looked it up again. The first section is the

standard research stuff about girls avoiding technology -- memorable

to me mostly because it profiled research done by my grad school

advisor. The second section, a personal essay, really hit home to me,

a female software engineer. It's called "Men Want to Force Computers

to Submit. Women Just Want Computers to Work"

Here's an excerpt:

"It was on e-mail, in fact, that I [the female author] described to

Ralph [her techie neighbor] how boys in groups often struggle to get

the upper hand whereas girls tend to maintain an appearance of

cooperation. And he pointed out that this explained why boys are more

likely to be captivated by computers than girls are. Boys are

typically motivated by a social structure that says if you don't

dominate you will be dominated. Computers, by their nature, balk: you

type a perfectly appropriate command and it refuses to do what it

should. Many boys and men are incited by this defiance: "I'm going to

whip this into line and teach it who's boss! I'll get it to do what I

say!" (and if they work hard enough, they always can). Girls and women

are more likely-to respond, "This thing won't cooperate. Get it away

from me!"

"Although no one wants to think of herself as "typical"--how much

nicer to be sui generis-my relationship to my computer is-gulp-fairly

typical for a woman [she likes it for the communication possibilities

it offers]. Most women (with plenty of exceptions) aren't excited by

tinkering with the technology, grappling with the challenge of

eliminating bugs or getting the biggest and best computer. These

dynamics appeal to many men's interest in making sure they're on the

top side of the inevitable who's-up-who's-down struggle that life is

for them. E-mail appeals to my view of life as a contest for

connections to others. When I see that I have 15 messages I feel loved."

There are plenty of girls who do, indeed, break this stereotype, but

as a sweeping generalization, the idea that girls don't like computers

because they don't cooperate has helped me become a better teacher to

those girls.

Background article begins here: http://www.newsweek.com/id/133594=20

Essay begins here: http://www.newsweek.com/id/133594/page/8=20

- marty

--

Marty Billingsley

Department of Computer Science

The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools

"Poole, Aeronia" <apoole@MADEIRA.org<mailto:apoole@MADEIRA.org>> =
writes:

>

> I didn't see Stephanie Oberle's email link, but I am curious to know

> what the gender ratio is to student participants of TV production

> crews.

> I recently attended a conference that had an 8th grade production

> crew.

> Of what looked like about 10 students, 1 was female. A colleague

> commented that girls just don't show interest in the techie stuff. Do

> you all find that true?

[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, =
non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=3DISED-L

[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=3DISED-L