when you set it up carefully and let it do it's thing. But that is
pretty much true of every scheduling program I've worked with. Had a
workable schedule in about two weeks, with all the consultations needed.
Would like a few more reports, but you can finagle. We used Edline to
submit course requests last year, and that went well; the ability of
department chairs being able to approve requests is a nice benefit,
don't know if Whipple Hill has that function.
Judith Claire Robison
Director of Technology
Saint John's Catholic Prep
Frederick, MD
-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for independent school educators
[mailto:ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Burnett
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 4:14 PM
To: ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Rediker Scheduling
I am looking for feedback (positive or negative) on using Rediker
Scheduling, based on ease of use and difficulty of importing and
exporting data. Also, if anyone is using it in conjunction with Whipple
Hill SIS, any experience would be great.
=20
=20
Andrew Burnett
Director of Technology
Saint Gertrude High School
3215 Stuart Ave
Richmond VA
=20
[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ] Submissions to
ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution,
non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=3DISED-L
[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=3DISED-L
