AP120's this summer which are slowly replacing our controller-based
Cisco APs. The price point is very competitive and, as Barrett
mentioned, easy to work with. Another attraction is no single
point-of-failure that controller-based systems have. We've set up the
HiveManager in a virtual machine and have had zero issues with it.
I've dealt with their tech support on some minor issues, too, as well as
catching a bug. Their support is stellar and responsive.
I highly recommend them!
Regards,
Kory
St. Catherine's School
Richmond, VA
On 7/31/2010 9:43 AM, Barrett Keziah wrote:
> Hi Renee,
>
> We went with Aerohive Networks last year and have been really happy with it
> since. While they have a hardware or virtual machine-based controller
> available, it is just for pushing configurations to the APs, reporting on
> end users and the like, so it is not a typical wireless controller like
> Cisco uses. We liked this option and their price was very reasonable.
> While I really haven't had to utilize their tech support for any major
> issues, the couple of minor config questions I've had for them were answered
> quickly and completely.
>
> www.aerohive.com
>
> Let me know if you would like any more details.
>
> Barrett Keziah
> Systems Administrator
> Ravenscroft School
[ For info on ISED-L see https://www.gds.org/podium/default.aspx?t=128874 ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
