Recently, we tested the Cymphonix, Marshall8e6, and the iPrism web filters.
We decided on the Cymphonix in the end, but it was close between the
Marshall8e6 and the Cymphonix. In the end, it mostly came down to the fact
that I found the web interface for the Cymphonix to be miles ahead of the
interface for the Marshall8e6. We also found that the Cymphonix had better
settings for filter and shaping.
Christopher
Christopher Butler
Director of Information Systems
St. John's Preparatory School
http://www.stjohnsprep.org
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Renee Ramig <rramig@sevenhillsschool.org>wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Sorry for all the posts but I really love all of your feedback. Of the
> six Bandwidth Optimizing and Content Filtering Products I have looked at
> via WebEx, the one I am leaning toward is Marshall8e6, followed by
> Exinda. I know one of you posted and said you loved Exinda. Does
> anyone have experience with Marshall 8e6 (or 8e6 before they merged with
> Marshall)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Renee Ramig
> Seven Hills School
>
> [ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
> Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution,
> non-commercial, share-alike license.
> RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
>
[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
