snoop at anytime when we believe there could be a problem.
Otherwise, snooping on other people's email just for the sake of it is just
as big as a time waster as playing Farmville on Facebook. You could pay the
admins both either way, and productivity would remain non-existant in both
cases.
Brian Lee
Manlius Pebble Hill School
> From: "Manns, Brian" <mannsb@culver.org>
> Reply-To: A forum for independent school educators <ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:35:57 -0400
> To: <ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> Subject: Re: Confidentiality
>
> We don't sign anything. It is expected that we only snoop when we are
> asked to snoop.
>
> Brian Manns
> Culver Academies
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A forum for independent school educators
> [mailto:ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Van Dyk
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 8:22 AM
> To: ISED-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Confidentiality
>
> Good Morning,
>
> Earlier this week I was approached by my Superintendent who wondered
> what protections or policies were in place to ensure privacy and
> confidentiality of e-mails, documents, etc. in regards to the Network
> Administrator. Do your Network Admins need to sign a code of ethics? Or
> is the general operating procedure to trust them to do their job and
> stay out of business that is not related to them? I think the
> Superintendent was trying to ensure protection for the Network Admin if
> any accusations were to come up.
>
>
> Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!
[ For info on ISED-L see https://www.gds.org/podium/default.aspx?t=128874 ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L
