Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Re: Ruckus

We went with Ruckus and have been very happy with it. We probably don't have
all the demands you all might have, but a huge upgrade from the
cobbled-together wireless network I inherited.

Jonathan
................................
Jonathan Mergy (jmergy@lwhs.org)
Director Of Technology
Lick-Wilmerding High School
755 Ocean Ave, SF CA 94112
P:415.333.4021 x365
http://www.lwhs.org


> From: William Stites <wstites@mka.org>
> Reply-To: ISED-L <ISED-L@listserv.syr.edu>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:01:57 -0500
> To: ISED-L <ISED-L@listserv.syr.edu>
> Subject: Re: Thoughts on Xirrus?
>
> Ruckus now has our attention.
> They offer an AP that is managed by a controller, but is not reliant
> on the controller as with the other systems. It manages the APs but
> does not get in the way of the data and therefore does not represent a
> single point of failure on the system. The way in which their APs
> work seem to do a better job at delivering the most focused bandwidth
> per user than any other solution we've looked at.

[ For info on ISED-L see http://www.gds.org/ISED-L ]
Submissions to ISED-L are released under a creative commons, attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
RSS Feed, http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?RSS&L=ISED-L